Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Friday, February 3
    Trending
    • February 3, 2023: Some Questions on this Week’s News
    • This Day in History on February 3rd
    • History Short: The Most Important Naval Battle You Never Heard Of
    • This Day in History on February 2nd
    • History Short: What Else is February 2nd Known For?
    • Triumphs and Tragedies of the Space Shuttle Program: A Compilation
    • This Day in History on February 1st
    • History Short: Who is America’s Greatest Male Actor?
    History and Headlines
    • Arts & Entertainment
      • Cinema & TV
      • Games
      • Literature
      • Music
      • Sports
      • Video Games
    • Bizarre Bulletin
      • Misconceptions
      • The Bizarre
      • The Paranormal
      • The Unexplained
    • Lifestyle
      • Animals/Pets
      • Fashion
      • Food
      • Health/Medicine
      • Home Improvement
      • Horoscopes
      • Travel
    • Science & Tech
      • Inventions
      • Nature
      • Vehicles
    • Society
      • Business and Economics
      • Crime
      • Military
      • Politics
      • Religion
      • Society
    • About
      • Welcome to Our Site!
      • This Day in History
      • Table of Contents: A History of the World
      • Online History Textbooks
      • A Guide to Some of Our Favorite Scholars and Educators
      • Advance Screenings and Movie Reviews Archive
      • Schedule of Video Adaptations of Our Articles
    • Friends
      • Armchair History TV
      • Fact Fiend
      • RealClearHistory
      • Simply Charly
      • TopTenz
      • ​Unique Interpretations
    History and Headlines
    You are at:Home»Society»Military»More Battles Won by Trickery
    Military

    More Battles Won by Trickery

    Major DanBy Major DanOctober 30, 2019Updated:October 30, 2019No Comments6 Mins Read
    Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Tumblr Twitter VKontakte WhatsApp
    trickery

    A Brief History

    On October 30, 1806, 5300 Prussian soldiers defending the city of Stettin surrendered to only 800 French soldiers commanded by General Lassalle, falling for the ruse that the French force was much larger.  We previously used this example of wartime trickery as the start of our article, “Fooled You! Battles Won by Trickery.”  Today we continue to explore the use of ruses, false information, decoys, fakes and general trickery in the conduct of warfare.  Here are some more such incidents, and like our previous article, concerning World War II (with other tricky battles from other wars to follow in later articles):

    Digging Deeper

    Another of the many tricky stunts pulled by the Allies in conjunction with the D-Day invasion of Normandy, France on June 6, 1944, was the use of fake paratroopers dropping from the sky to confuse German defenders on the eve of the D-Day landings.  While real parachute operations were taking place, the Allies dropped 500 “paradummies,” 3 foot tall fake paratroopers onto areas intended to draw German soldiers away from real drop zones.  In order to “sell” the ruse even more, the paradummies were designed to burst into flame upon landing, hopefully destroying the evidence of trickery.  Finally, to really make the decoy paratrooper drops believed by the Germans, the Allies also dropped a few real paratroopers who played “war sounds” recordings to create the illusion of a raging battle!

    During the North Africa Campaign by the British against the Germans and Italians (1940-1943), the British were particularly adept at fooling the Germans at every opportunity.  Extensive use of fake radio transmissions and feeding suspected enemy agents false information was employed, and even a fake water pipe was constructed across the desert to make the Germans believe the British would be attacking in the direction of the water pipe instead of the real direction.  Another ruse used by the British was extensive use of camouflage of their vehicles and emplacements, and the use of trucks dressed up to look like tanks to fool enemy reconnaissance.  Small numbers of trucks were used to ride back and forth, thus kicking up large amounts of dust, giving the false impression of massive vehicular movement in order to throw off the enemy analysis of British movements.  These combined efforts seem to have been fairly effective.  The 1942 Battle of El Alamein was a particularly good example of British ingenuity.

    In 1944, the US Navy and its allies had taken a decided advantage in the Pacific War against the Japanese Empire.  General Douglas MacArthur was determined to reconquer the Philippine Islands and make good on his promise to “return.”  During the Allied invasion of the Philippines, Admiral William “Bull” Halsey, Navy Cross recipient and later Fleet Admiral (5 stars), got suckered by the Japanese into leaving the US landings in the Philippines at Leyte Gulf to chase a decoy force well north of the area.  The lightly protected landing force survived only because of the incredible bravery of the men on the few smaller warships left in the area.  As US Navy top brass wondered where Halsey and his big ships were, a message sent to Halsey asking where he was included an add-on decoy message “the world wonders” causing irate embarrassment to Halsey.

    The Soviets were not to be left out when it came to using tricks to win battles.  During the Kursk campaign in October of 1943, the Soviets spread rumors among their own men that their forces were much smaller than they really were, disinformation meant to reach the ears of spies for the Germans.  The ruse was successful, and German agents reported a Soviet force of minimal proportions when in fact the Soviet troops outnumbered the attacking Germans 4 to 1!  (Normal battle doctrine is the attacking force must enjoy a 3 to 1 advantage to ensure success.)  The Soviets also employed extensive camouflage and were sure to move troops and supplies at night when the German recon aircraft could not see the movements.  In order to minimize the damage caused by German bombing from the air, the Soviets constructed fake airfields and fake airplanes in order to draw attacks from German bombers, giving their real airfields a much needed respite.  German estimates were of a Soviet force consisting of 400,000 troops, 1500 tanks, and a paltry air force.  They were wrong!  The Soviet forces attacked by the hapless Germans was in reality over 1.3 million men and 3000 tanks backed up by nearly 3000 airplanes.  The German attack failed against the steel wall of Soviet defenses and led to a German retreat that continued until the end of the war.  Kursk was the last of the big German offensive operations in the East and can be considered the real turning point of the war (sorry Stalingrad).  In contrast to the Soviet efforts at deception, the German preparations were well documented by the Soviet intelligence system and Soviet generals were well aware of the formations and plans opposing them.

    The battle does not always go to the strongest military force.  Sometimes a bit of deception or even “trickery” as we like to call it makes the difference between winning and losing, or at least nearly winning or losing (as at Leyte Gulf).  We will continue to explore the subject of military trickery during World War II and other wars in future articles, and no, we are not tricking you!

    Question for students (and subscribers): What World War II battle do you believe would have benefited from some trickery by one side or the other?  Please let us know in the comments section below this article.

    If you liked this article and would like to receive notification of new articles, please feel welcome to subscribe to History and Headlines by liking us on Facebook and becoming one of our patrons!

    Your readership is much appreciated!

    Historical Evidence

    For more information, please see…

    Holt, Thaddeus. The Deceivers: Allied Military Deception in the Second World War. Skyhorse, 2010.

    Latimer, Jon. Deception in War.  Thistle Publishing, 2016.

    Whaley, Barton. Stratagem: Deception and Surprise in War. Artech House, 2007.

    The featured image in this article, an anonymous 19th century plate of the taking of Stettin by French troops in 1806, is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason: This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author’s life plus 70 years or fewer.

    Share. Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Twitter Tumblr
    Previous Article6 Best Career Choices for a Virgo
    Next Article A Brief Understanding of Direct Marketing Approach with Apifonica
    Major Dan

    Major Dan is a retired veteran of the United States Marine Corps. He served during the Cold War and has traveled to many countries around the world. Prior to his military service, he graduated from Cleveland State University, having majored in sociology. Following his military service, he worked as a police officer eventually earning the rank of captain prior to his retirement.

    Related Posts

    History Short: The Most Important Naval Battle You Never Heard Of

    February 3, 2023

    History Short: What Poison Gasses were Used in World War I?

    January 31, 2023

    Animated Map of the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine (through January 30th, 2023)

    January 30, 2023
    Follow Us!
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Patreon
    Sign Up For Our Newsletter!
    Most Recent

    February 3, 2023: Some Questions on this Week’s News

    February 3, 2023

    This Day in History on February 3rd

    February 3, 2023

    History Short: The Most Important Naval Battle You Never Heard Of

    February 3, 2023

    This Day in History on February 2nd

    February 2, 2023

    History Short: What Else is February 2nd Known For?

    February 2, 2023
    This Day in History Video

    Advertisements




    Amazon Affiliate Disclosure Statement

    As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases via links in the “Historical Evidence” sections of articles.

    About HistoryAndHeadlines.com

    Thanks for visiting History and Headlines!  This site exists primarily for educational purposes and is intended as a resource for Dr. Zar’s students.  Articles are mostly written by either Dr. Zar or his dad (Major Dan).  To any guest readers, please keep that in mind when commenting on articles.   Thank you!

    We try to present our students with historical topics that are both diverse and a bit out of the ordinary.  Our motto is “We try until we succeed!”

    Contact us at admin@historyandheadlines.com

    Guidelines and Policies for Images used on This Site, as well as for Guest and Sponsored Articles, and Other Terms of Use

    Privacy Statement

    © 2022 History and Headlines

    All-Time Most Commented

    July 28, 1866: 18 Year Old Girl Wins Commission to Sculpt Statue of Lincoln (A Truly Great American Woman)

    July 28, 2014

    December 24, 1865: Birth of the Ku Klux Klan

    December 24, 2015

    December 25, 1868: President Johnson Pardons all Confederate Veterans

    December 25, 2015

    February 5, 1909: First Plastic Invented was called Bakelite!

    February 5, 2014

    November 23, 1876: “Boss” Tweed Turned Over to Authorities

    November 23, 2013
    Recommended Book
    © 2023 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

    You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

    History and Headlines
    Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

    Strictly Necessary Cookies

    Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

    If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.