Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Sunday, March 26
    Trending
    • This Day in History on March 26th
    • This Day in History on March 25th
    • This Day in History on March 24th
    • History Short: Has Any US President Ever Been Arrested?
    • This Day in History on March 23rd
    • R.I.P. Lance Reddick (1962-2023)
    • This Day in History on March 22nd
    • This Day in History on March 21st
    History and Headlines
    • Arts & Entertainment
      • Cinema & TV
      • Games
      • Literature
      • Music
      • Sports
      • Video Games
    • Bizarre Bulletin
      • Misconceptions
      • The Bizarre
      • The Paranormal
      • The Unexplained
    • Lifestyle
      • Animals/Pets
      • Fashion
      • Food
      • Health/Medicine
      • Home Improvement
      • Horoscopes
      • Travel
    • Science & Tech
      • Inventions
      • Nature
      • Vehicles
    • Society
      • Business and Economics
      • Crime
      • Military
      • Politics
      • Religion
      • Society
    • About
      • Welcome to Our Site!
      • This Day in History
      • Table of Contents: A History of the World
      • Online History Textbooks
      • A Guide to Some of Our Favorite Scholars and Educators
      • Advance Screenings and Movie Reviews Archive
      • Schedule of Video Adaptations of Our Articles
    • Friends
      • Armchair History TV
      • Fact Fiend
      • RealClearHistory
      • Simply Charly
      • TopTenz
      • ​Unique Interpretations
    History and Headlines
    You are at:Home»Society»Business and Economics»Traditional Laws and Practices that Make Women Inferior
    Business and Economics

    Traditional Laws and Practices that Make Women Inferior

    Major DanBy Major DanDecember 4, 2019Updated:December 4, 2019No Comments8 Mins Read
    Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Tumblr Twitter VKontakte WhatsApp
    suttee

    A Brief History

    On December 4, 1829, the British Governor-General Lord William Bentinck, representative of the King of the United Kingdom in India, made a ruling that was vehemently opposed by local Indian people (presumably men) that made the traditional practice of suttee (also known as sati) illegal.  This practice being outlawed was a time honored Indian tradition of a widow sits or lays on top of the funeral pyre of her husband, sacrificing herself by being incinerated along with the body of her deceased spouse.  Suttee was a traditional practice in the Bengal region of India and had no equivalent sacrifice for the surviving husbands of wives that had died!  Today we discuss a few of these practices that seem to be somewhat unevenly applied to the fairer sex to the point of being discriminatory.  Parental rights, women’s suffrage, dowries, divorce laws, credit laws and a host of other areas have all been uneven in the treatment of the genders, though we will discuss only a few of these topics today. (Note: We have previously published numerous articles about women’s rights, women’s accomplishments and women’s issues.  Search our site for “women” or “women’s rights” for more reading.)

    Digging Deeper

    Suttee.

    When the British gained control of India, particularly the Eastern part of the country and the Bengal region, they were appalled by the practice of suttee, especially the Christian missionaries that accompanied the traders and government administrators.  The 1829 declaration by Lord Bentinck came in response to a marked increase of the practice in Bengal.  In Western India, the practice of suttee had largely diminished with the corresponding decision to allow widows the right to remarry.  As if being burned alive is not bad enough, an alternative form of suttee concerned burying the grieving widow alive!  The order by Lord Bentinck also made anyone who partook of the practice of suttee criminally liable as a murderer.

    Female infanticide.

    Another practice in India that was outlawed by the British occupiers was female infanticide.  Families often viewed having a girl baby as a liability, and preferred to have boys, especially as the first born.  Before there were any scientific ways to make the gender of a fetus more likely or to detect the gender of a developing fetus, people had to wait until the baby was born to see what they had.  Those people unhappy with being presented by a female baby would sometimes kill the innocent little girl in favor of trying again to have a boy.  The Female Infanticide Prevention Act, 1870 was instituted by the British Raj (the rulers of India) to prevent this practice, although originally the law only covered some of the states.  The “1 child” rule in China (1979-2015) was an attempt by the government of China to slow down population growth.  Families distraught at having a girl as their only child often killed the baby without ever reporting the birth in order to have a boy.  The Chinese soon instituted an exception to the rule, to allow a family that had a female first child to have a do over and bear a second child in an effort to have their precious male baby.  Obviously, if the second child was female, the female infanticide specter was once again raised.  Even since 2015 when the policy was discarded, Chinese families may want only a single child and want that single child to be a boy.  In spite of laws and attempts at education, it is estimated that in China and India combined at least 2 million female babies go “missing” each year!  Other cultures, ethnicities and religions are not immune to this phenomenon.  In modern, industrialized cultures the rise of medical technology has allowed prospective parents to try to steer the gender of a prospective baby toward the desired gender, which is usually male.  Also, where it is allowed, abortion of female fetuses takes place in favor of producing male babies.  The exact influence of gender selecting babies is hard to come by and seems to probably be fairly small.  The natural rate of male to female births is about 103-105 males to every 100 female babies, and in some Asian countries the ratio is closer to 107 or 108 males to female.

    Inheritance Laws.

    People are people, and a human being is as good as any other human being, or so we are told.  Not so much when it comes to inheritance.  Some countries and cultures still treat male and female heirs differently, especially in the patriarchal types of societies found in the Islamic World and in more traditional types of culture, especially Africa, the Middle East, and Asia.  Women’s rights activists have even called such discriminatory practices “violence against women.”  In the United States inheritance laws have not always been gender neutral, though the last couple centuries have seen a definite trend toward equal inheritance rights in the US.  The rest of the world has not necessarily caught up.  Not only is property and money in an estate at issue, the succession to a Royal Throne is also a topic for discrimination against women.  In the United Kingdom, probably the most publicized monarchy in the world, The Succession to the Crown Act 2013 overturned the 1722 version of the law of succession that had stated that the first born “son” would be the heir to the throne.  The new law makes the first-born child of either sex the legitimate heir.  This change in British Royal law came about as a consequence of the Perth Agreement of 2011 in which 16 Commonwealth countries demanded a change to the laws of succession so as to be gender neutral.  Several current monarchies still favor the first born legitimate male child over any daughter born first, including Japan and Saudi Arabia.

    Miscellaneous laws limiting women.

    In recent years the Saudi Arabian law against allowing women to drive cars has been a frequent topic on the news, and the Kingdom finally relented in 2017, with a Royal Declaration that finally gave women the right to get a driver’s license and operate a motor vehicle as of June 2018. Previously, women’s rights activists that defied the law and drove in Saudi Arabia were arrested and charged with a crime.  In some countries, a woman who is the victim of a rape may be forced to marry the rapist!  Or at least pressured to marry the rapist so the rapist will not have to go to jail.  Most countries with such laws have modified or repealed the laws in the past several decades, but some cultures cling to the practice whether the law demands it or not.  In some other cases, a female rape victim may be prosecuted for a crime for being the victim of a rape.  Often if the victim is a minor, the parents of the victim are allowed to force the girl to marry the rapist.  You may have heard in some cultures a wife or daughter needs the permission of the husband/father to even leave the house, and of course these cases are mainly in traditional strict Islamic societies, but in the US there are still plenty of places where women need a man’s permission to do certain things, especially regarding abortion, giving the presumptive father (even a rapist!) the right to veto an abortion.  Credit laws and contracts used to be highly discriminatory against women, even in the United States. Until 1974, American single women could be refused the issuance of a credit card or loan, and married women often required permission from their husband to be granted credit.  (Hey, that is not so long ago!)  (Note: Harvard did not admit women until 1977 and Princeton and Yale did not allow female students until 1969, possibly because they could not get student loans!)

    We choose to arbitrarily stop here, perhaps leaving the millions of other topics of gender inequality for other articles.

    Question for students (and subscribers): Why have there been so many laws that have oppressed women in history?  Please let us know in the comments section below this article.

    If you liked this article and would like to receive notification of new articles, please feel welcome to subscribe to History and Headlines by liking us on Facebook and becoming one of our patrons!

    Your readership is much appreciated!

    Historical Evidence

    For more information, please see…

    Lorber, Judith. Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics.  Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Newton, David. Gender Inequality: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO, 2019.

    Sen, Mala. Death by Fire: Sati, Dowry Death, and Female Infanticide in Modern India. Rutgers University Press, 2002.

    The featured image in this article, an 18th-century painting depicting sati (suttee), is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason: This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author’s life plus 100 years or fewer.

    Share. Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Twitter Tumblr
    Previous ArticleStunning Ways In Which Fashion Businesses Can Use Instagram
    Next Article The Hardest Essay Topics & Efficient Ways to Deal with Them
    Major Dan

    Major Dan is a retired veteran of the United States Marine Corps. He served during the Cold War and has traveled to many countries around the world. Prior to his military service, he graduated from Cleveland State University, having majored in sociology. Following his military service, he worked as a police officer eventually earning the rank of captain prior to his retirement.

    Related Posts

    History Short: Has Any US President Ever Been Arrested?

    March 24, 2023

    Happy Saint Patrick’s Day and Women’s History Month 2023!

    March 17, 2023

    History Short: Is Nuclear Power Safe?

    March 12, 2023
    Follow Us!
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Patreon
    Sign Up For Our Newsletter!
    Most Recent

    This Day in History on March 26th

    March 26, 2023

    This Day in History on March 25th

    March 25, 2023

    This Day in History on March 24th

    March 24, 2023

    History Short: Has Any US President Ever Been Arrested?

    March 24, 2023

    This Day in History on March 23rd

    March 23, 2023
    This Day in History Video

    Advertisements




    Amazon Affiliate Disclosure Statement

    As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases via links in the “Historical Evidence” sections of articles.

    About HistoryAndHeadlines.com

    Thanks for visiting History and Headlines!  This site exists primarily for educational purposes and is intended as a resource for Dr. Zar’s students.  Articles are mostly written by either Dr. Zar or his dad (Major Dan).  To any guest readers, please keep that in mind when commenting on articles.   Thank you!

    We try to present our students with historical topics that are both diverse and a bit out of the ordinary.  Our motto is “We try until we succeed!”

    Contact us at admin@historyandheadlines.com

    Guidelines and Policies for Images used on This Site, as well as for Guest and Sponsored Articles, and Other Terms of Use

    Privacy Statement

    © 2023 History and Headlines

    All-Time Most Commented

    July 28, 1866: 18 Year Old Girl Wins Commission to Sculpt Statue of Lincoln (A Truly Great American Woman)

    July 28, 2014

    December 24, 1865: Birth of the Ku Klux Klan

    December 24, 2015

    December 25, 1868: President Johnson Pardons all Confederate Veterans

    December 25, 2015

    February 5, 1909: First Plastic Invented was called Bakelite!

    February 5, 2014

    November 23, 1876: “Boss” Tweed Turned Over to Authorities

    November 23, 2013
    Recommended Book
    © 2023 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

    You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

    History and Headlines
    Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

    Strictly Necessary Cookies

    Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

    If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.