Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Sunday, December 3
    Trending
    • This Day in History on December 3rd
    • History Short: Disputed Presidential Elections are Nothing New!
    • This Day in History on December 2nd
    • History Short: What Replaced the Ford Model T?
    • This Day in History on December 1st
    • History Short: US Government Intentionally Crashes an Airliner!
    • This Day in History on November 30th
    • History Shorts: Iconic Structures Destroyed by Fire
    History and Headlines
    • Arts & Entertainment
      • Cinema & TV
      • Games
      • Literature
      • Music
      • Sports
      • Video Games
    • Bizarre Bulletin
      • Misconceptions
      • The Bizarre
      • The Paranormal
      • The Unexplained
    • Lifestyle
      • Animals/Pets
      • Fashion
      • Food
      • Health/Medicine
      • Home Improvement
      • Horoscopes
      • Travel
    • Science & Tech
      • Inventions
      • Nature
      • Vehicles
    • Society
      • Business and Economics
      • Crime
      • Military
      • Politics
      • Religion
      • Society
    • About
      • Welcome to Our Site!
      • This Day in History (articles)
      • This Day in History (categories)
      • Table of Contents: A History of the World
      • Online History Textbooks
      • A Guide to Some of Our Favorite Scholars and Educators
      • Advance Screenings and Movie Reviews Archive
      • Schedule of Video Adaptations of Our Articles
    • Friends
      • Armchair History TV
      • Fact Fiend
      • RealClearHistory
      • Simply Charly
      • TopTenz
      • ​Unique Interpretations
    History and Headlines
    You are at:Home»Society»Military»October 7, 1940: Why Do People Think FDR Planned Pearl Harbor?
    Military

    October 7, 1940: Why Do People Think FDR Planned Pearl Harbor?

    Major DanBy Major DanOctober 7, 2016Updated:May 26, 202079 Comments4 Mins Read
    Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Tumblr Twitter VKontakte WhatsApp
    FDR

    A Brief History

    On October 7, 1940, the Director of the Far East Section of the Office of Naval Intelligence, Lt. Cmdr. Arthur McCollum, sent an infamous memo up his chain of command that seems to recommend the United States provoke Japan into attacking US forces, thus allowing the US an excuse to enter World War II (WWII) in spite of President Franklin Roosevelt’s promise to stay out of the war.

    Digging Deeper

    McCollum was responsible for reading and interpreting the decoded intercepts of Japanese secret radio traffic and for monitoring the political and military situation in the Far East. In 2001 a book by Robert Stinnett, Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor, made the case that Roosevelt intentionally sacrificed the US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor to a Japanese attack intentionally provoked by US actions as a pretense to allow Roosevelt to get the US into World War II. FDR knew the American people wanted to stay out of foreign entanglements and would not stand for a violation of his campaign promise to keep out of the war, so he needed a casus belli that would give him the support of the people in entering the war.

    Photograph of Battleship Row taken from a Japanese plane at the beginning of the attack. The explosion in the center is a torpedo strike on USS West Virginia. Two attacking Japanese planes can be seen: one over USS Neosho and one over the Naval Yard.

    Many US military and political leaders expected Japanese reaction to US provocation and embargo of vital raw materials to generate offensive action by Japan, and Admiral Chester Nimitz refused command of the Pacific Fleet so as to avoid being made a scapegoat for the inevitable debacle a surprise attack would generate.

    McCollum did not have a direct line to President Roosevelt, and himself denied advocating for intentionally triggering war with Japan, facts overlooked by Stinnett in his book. Still, the Eight Actions recommended by McCollum certainly could be expected to infuriate the Japanese and quite possibly provoke an attack, if not certainly provoking war. The deployment of ground and naval forces including submarines into territory Japan wanted to control, support of the Chinese under Chiang Kai Shek, and support of the Dutch against Japanese demands for concessions all seemed sure to provoke the Japanese. The last “action,” that of the US embargo against Japan on all trade by US and Britain would likely be the last straw and almost force the Japanese to attack the US and Britain.

    USS West Virginia was sunk by six torpedoes and two bombs during the attack

    Despite any proof that President Roosevelt ever even saw the McCollum memo Stinnett’s book led to widespread acceptance of the theory that FDR and the US intentionally goaded Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor, although it says nothing about whether or not the attack was intentionally permitted to succeed so spectacularly. Other mainstream historians’ analysis of the memo and the broader situation come to the conclusion that there was no conspiracy to provoke a Japanese attack and no intention of hiding the coming attack from US military commanders in the Pacific. The subject remains open to debate, like so many others.

    Question for students (and subscribers): Do you think the US intentionally provoked war with Japan as an excuse for entering WWII on the side of Britain? Do you think Pearl Harbor was a US conspiracy that sacrificed American lives for a political agenda? Please share your thoughts and opinions on these subjects with your fellow readers in the comments section below this article.

     

    If you liked this article and would like to receive notification of new articles, please feel welcome to subscribe to History and Headlines by liking us on Facebook and becoming one of our patrons!

    Your readership is much appreciated!

    Historical Evidence

    For more information, please see…

    Stinnett, Robert.  Day Of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor.  Free Press, 2001.

    The featured image in this article, a retouched picture of the wreckage of the USS Arizona ablaze after the attack, has been digitally altered from its original version.  The original can be viewed here: The USS Arizona (BB-39) burning after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor – NARA – 195617.tif.  Modifications were made by Mmxx.  This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1977 without a copyright notice.

    Share. Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Twitter Tumblr
    Previous ArticleDecember 530 BC: Tomyris, a “Worthy Woman”, Kills Cyrus the Great
    Next Article October 8, 1871: Worse than the Great Chicago Fire, The Peshtigo Fire
    Major Dan
    Major Dan

      Major Dan is a retired veteran of the United States Marine Corps. He served during the Cold War and has traveled to many countries around the world. Prior to his military service, he graduated from Cleveland State University, having majored in sociology. Following his military service, he worked as a police officer eventually earning the rank of captain prior to his retirement.

      Related Posts

      History Short: Disputed Presidential Elections are Nothing New!

      December 3, 2023

      History Shorts: Iconic Structures Destroyed by Fire

      November 30, 2023

      History Short: Assassination Meets the Space Age

      November 27, 2023

      <span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="14748 https://www.historyandheadlines.com/?p=14748">79 Comments

      1. Avatar
        MM on October 26, 2016 10:38 pm

        In all honestly, if someone is going to provoke you into doing something, you probably will end up doing it to prove a point just like FDR did. I don’t blame him for defending out country at this time.

        Reply
      2. Avatar
        MT on November 12, 2016 12:41 pm

        Its crazy that some people believe that FDR planned and new about pearl harbor. That is a serious accusation to make.

        Reply
      3. Avatar
        Nicholas Hillyer on November 16, 2016 5:36 pm

        I mean I understand we have some bad politicians but knowing and allowing all those ships to go down and the amount of life loss to happen I just can’t see it. How could you sleep at night if you allowed that to happen?

        Reply
      4. Avatar
        Diana Minich on November 19, 2016 9:34 pm

        I don’t think that FDR had prior knowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack, but I do think he thought we should join the war before we did. I don’t think we provoked Japan either. I believe they thought we were weak by staying neutral and thought we would go down easy.

        Reply
      5. Avatar
        Kala Strong on November 20, 2016 5:34 pm

        I do not believe that FDR had any previous knowledge of Pearl Harbor. I also do not believe that there is any president to this day who would know about the possible death of many Americans and do nothing about it.

        Reply
      6. Avatar
        Taylor Young on November 21, 2016 12:03 pm

        There are always going to be wonder on what provokes any war, and I just think this is one opinion. I do not believe FDR thought we should enter the war. Besides he knew the American people did not want to get involved. By staying neutral and not taking a side actually did not do the United States any good for once.

        Reply
      7. Avatar
        Lydia Ott on November 22, 2016 1:08 pm

        I could not see FDR wanting to provoke Japan into attacking U.S. forces as an excuse to enter WWII, especially after he promised to stay out of foreign affairs. This event took the lives of many innocent people at Pearl Harbor and would cost many soldiers their lives.

        Reply
      8. Avatar
        Lessie Parish on November 22, 2016 3:05 pm

        There are many conspiracies about some of President’s actions. I do not think that FDR provoked Japan. I think FDR was trying to stay out of the war because it was what the American people wanted.

        Reply
      9. Avatar
        Jordin Vidmar on November 22, 2016 7:49 pm

        Conspiracy theories really interest me. I do not believe that FDR wanted to join the war effort though.

        Reply
      10. Avatar
        Elizabeth Bon on November 24, 2016 1:31 pm

        There is always doubt when it comes to conspiracy theories but I really think Japan planned all along to attack the U.S. specifically at Pear Harbor. It was part of a strategic plan to gain control over Southeast Asia. The U.S. had to be prepared but I find it hard to believe FDR would sacrifice so many lives especially left as sitting ducks.

        Reply
      11. Avatar
        Brandon Wagner on November 25, 2016 3:22 pm

        I read another article that stated that Japan never sent out code specifically stating an attack on Pearl Harbor. Therefore, FDR could not have known about the attack and allowed it to happen.

        Reply
      12. Avatar
        Ben McClay on November 25, 2016 5:41 pm

        The fact that FDR knew that the American people wanted to stay out of foreign entanglements reminds me of the politics of today. Overall, the relationship with other countries is a hot topic and is readily debated today.

        Reply
      13. Avatar
        Audrey Manahan on November 25, 2016 9:01 pm

        Political affairs are hard to follow, but it would be a shame if leaders would blatantly ignore the thoughts of the people. I know it often happens, but I cannot imagine it on this big of a scale with FDR and WWI.

        Reply
      14. Avatar
        Dakota Zimmerman on November 25, 2016 11:20 pm

        I dont think that FDR was the type of man to sacrifice human lives to provoke a war

        Reply
      15. Avatar
        Rose Jepson on November 26, 2016 11:45 am

        Although many articles I’ve read make me wonder about this event being known of beforehand, I personally do not think that FDR was aware of this, or at least I hope not. That attack killed over 2,000 men. Why would the U.S. want to sacrifice their own military to join a war that those same men would have been able to help fight in? They even lost war weapons like their battleships that would have helped in war.

        Reply
      16. Avatar
        Lori Caudill on November 26, 2016 1:52 pm

        I have read additional material that speculates President Roosevelt’s involvement and knowledge of Japan’s attack. Roosevelt imposed bans on trade that drastically affected Japan’s economy and access to resources. I do not believe that President Roosevelt intentionally provoked Japan. I believe the act of war was in retaliation to the hardships Roosevelt’s bans caused.

        Reply
      17. Avatar
        Alyssa Hanes on November 26, 2016 3:15 pm

        I have never before heard of this concept that FDR would have an involvement in Japan’s attack. I feel that this is faulty and could not be right. I do not see why Roosevelt would want to sacrifice so many of his own men as the President of America. If anything, I feel that he would want to bring as much peace as possible.

        Reply
      18. Avatar
        Jingshan Jiang on November 26, 2016 4:42 pm

        I do not believe that Pearl Harbor was a US conspiracy that sacrificed American lives for a political agenda. Pearl Harbor brought nothing but pain to the United States.

        Reply
      19. Avatar
        Shuling He on November 26, 2016 4:54 pm

        I don’t believe FDR would involve in the Japan’s attack.

        Reply
      20. Avatar
        Shannon Read on November 26, 2016 6:02 pm

        I disagree that FDR pushed for Pearl Harbor to occur. Prior to reading this article I have never this conspiracy. I don’t understand how or why he would want to sacrifice so many people.

        Reply
      21. Avatar
        Breanna Beckley on November 26, 2016 7:42 pm

        I have to agree with Shannon, I do not believe that FDR pushed for Pearl Harbor to occur.

        Reply
      22. Avatar
        Daina Thomas on November 26, 2016 11:06 pm

        There’s no way FDR wanted Pearl Harbor to happen.

        Reply
      23. Avatar
        AA on November 28, 2016 11:30 pm

        I have never heard of this theory before. The only explanation I ever got for Pearl Harbor is the Japanese wanted to take Hawaii.

        Reply
      24. Avatar
        Natalie antonio on November 29, 2016 10:34 am

        I had never heard of this idea and theory before reading this article, the only reasoning that I was ever taught was that Hawaii was the closest thing for Japan to attack and do the most damage

        Reply
      25. Avatar
        Maxwell McCullough on November 30, 2016 10:04 am

        I’ve heard that we were restricting Japanese trade (mainly oil) which was hurting them severely economically. This was kind of the like poking the bear with the stick but when the bear attacks you he realizes that you are a lion. And to believe that FDR planned this is absurd to me.

        Reply
      26. Avatar
        Montel Lollis on December 1, 2016 12:27 pm

        understanding its like a bullying thing here, but i don’t think the FDR wanted the war or invasion on pearl harbor to happen, but then again you never know what tricks people have up their sleeve.

        Reply
      27. Avatar
        Jessica May on December 2, 2016 8:59 pm

        I thought it was because Hawaii was closest for Japan. I’ve never heard any theories until now

        Reply
      28. Avatar
        Courtney G on December 4, 2016 3:28 pm

        Some people think anything and everything bad that happens is a conspiracy which is ridiculous to me.

        Reply
      29. Avatar
        Suzie M. Shaffer on December 4, 2016 8:59 pm

        After every tragedy people make up so many theories, just like the government being behind 9-11.

        Reply
      30. Avatar
        Matthew Weller on December 6, 2016 10:26 pm

        I do not believe the US government had anything to do with Pearl Harbor. People always make up conspiracy theory’s after a tragic event happens.

        Reply
      31. Avatar
        Kristin Fellure on December 6, 2016 11:03 pm

        I do not believe that FDR had anything to do with Pearl Harbor. We did not have the amount of troops desired yet, so i doubt he would call for an attack.

        Reply
      32. Avatar
        LF on December 7, 2016 12:30 pm

        I believe this is a bunch of rubbish, no president would plan for their entire fleet to be took out all at once.

        Reply
      33. Avatar
        ES on December 7, 2016 5:50 pm

        FDR did not have anything to do with Pearl Harbor. There is always some kind of blame put on someone else.

        Reply
      34. Avatar
        Keagan Frey on December 8, 2016 10:38 pm

        Its just a conspiracy theory just like “Bush did 911”.

        Reply
      35. Avatar
        Travis Tarnowski on December 9, 2016 8:24 pm

        Right away when I read the headline it made me sick that people even think that. Same thing with Bush doing 9/11. It hurts me to even think that. If it is true, I never want to know.

        Reply
      36. Avatar
        Hunter Music on December 10, 2016 3:15 am

        I do not believe a year long planned attacked could be invoked by FDR. Too much conspiracy from people who cannot accept the truth.

        Reply
      37. Avatar
        Kayla Fox on December 10, 2016 4:54 am

        There are always going to be conspiracy theories, especially with presidents. Bush did 911, Obama is a Muslim. I do not think this is true, but I have never heard of this conspiracy theory!

        Reply
      38. Avatar
        Alexis Dykes on December 11, 2016 2:14 am

        i had never heard that people may have thought the FDR “planned Pearl Harbor,” but the thought that someone would do such a thing is unnerving. Personally, I do not think that FDR provoked Japan or planned the attack on our country.

        Reply
      39. Avatar
        Jared A. Hutt on February 4, 2017 6:03 pm

        It doesn’t matter what the situation, someone, somewhere will make up a conspiracy about it, regardless of facts.

        Reply
        • Avatar
          Jared Good on February 5, 2017 5:57 pm

          Your right someway somehow a conspiracy comes out. It happens all the time. Look at now all the conspiracies on the World Trade Center.

          Reply
          • Avatar
            Chelsey Stillings on February 5, 2017 10:13 pm

            I cant agree more.No matter the circumstance someone will come up with nothing new each day.

            Reply
      40. Avatar
        Jared Good on February 5, 2017 5:56 pm

        It is great U.S tried to not get involved in World War II but when the bombing of Pearl Harbor just took what we didn’t want and that was another war. We couldn’t stand by while the Japanese bombed our Nation.

        Reply
      41. Avatar
        Kay McCargish on February 6, 2017 11:04 am

        It would not surprise me in the least to find out that this is true. It would also not surprise me if this was a conspiracy theory.

        Reply
      42. Avatar
        Dan Sumpter on February 6, 2017 8:35 pm

        Many leaders who go against their supervision take several steps to make thing happen the way they want them to happen. This doesn’t surprise me at all. I just hope it doesn’t happen like this and cause a WWIII

        Reply
      43. Avatar
        Cara Zang on February 7, 2017 9:03 am

        I am unfamiliar with FDR and a conspiracy with Pearl Harbor, it almost seems like anytime something terrible happens their is some kind of conspiracy with it.

        Reply
      44. Avatar
        Christie Benton on February 8, 2017 7:49 pm

        The argument that FDR knew about the attack is a good one. The likelihood that FDR knew the severity of the attack, was probably small. It is doubtful that he would allow this many men to die at the hands of the enemy.

        Reply
      45. Avatar
        Dan Fidoe on February 9, 2017 1:57 pm

        I would not be surprised if they did agree to such an atrocity. Shame that this is even a discussion. Politics are so corrupt.

        Reply
      46. Avatar
        Juan Rodriguez on February 9, 2017 10:10 pm

        I don’t think the President knew that Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor, because Pearl Harbor was a vital post in the protection of West Coast. The President was trying to throw his weight around against Japan to start a fight, but he was not excepting for Japan to come after Pearl Harbor because if we would have loss Pearl Harbor completely the war would had a different result.

        Reply
      47. Avatar
        Jason Orellano on February 10, 2017 3:37 pm

        I’m not sure of FDR would do something like that but its funny that I had read the President Bush did something similar with the WTC bombing. He was aware the attacks were imminent and did not act to protect the people.

        Reply
      48. Avatar
        Kacey Kovac on February 10, 2017 10:18 pm

        I believe that politics can be so corrupt at times! I would hope that FDR wouldn’t do something that would end up hurting his own country, but it will most likely always be a mystery.

        Reply
      49. Avatar
        Jeffrey Keenan on February 11, 2017 9:00 am

        FDR did not know about Pearl Harbor (Prior to the horrific event). The bombing at Pearl Harbor was one of the worst things to ever happen to the United States and It was 100% unexpected. The Japanese had been planning this attack for years prior.

        Reply
      50. Avatar
        Michelle Ross on February 11, 2017 12:23 pm

        Pearl Harbor was not known before it actually happened. There were so many deaths and the whole event was too tragic for someone to know that that was going to happen. As a leader, I wouldn’t want that many people to die on my hands.

        Reply
      51. Avatar
        John Milton on February 12, 2017 12:28 am

        Pearl Harbor was such a tragedy that hit the hearts of every American. I can’t imagine that the leader of our country would be responsible for it.

        Reply
      52. Avatar
        Jeremiah Linden on February 12, 2017 6:46 pm

        I have heard many theories about Franklin Roosevelt knowing in advance about Pearl Harbor. I hope it isn’t true because so many innocent people died. However, America was standing by watching total destruction in Europe. Many Americans viewed this as a European conflict. There needed to be conflict on American soil for Roosevelt to have the backing of the American people.

        Reply
      53. Avatar
        Shannon Smith on February 12, 2017 8:02 pm

        I’m not 100% knowledgeable on the in’s and out’s of Pearl Harbor, but I cannot imagine that any US president would want to send his men and women into war. I feel that being that we are such a powerful force in the world of political matters, that it would have been hard for us to stay out of WWII completely.

        Reply
      54. Avatar
        Mackenzie H on February 17, 2017 9:29 pm

        The deployment of ground and naval forces including submarines into territory Japan wanted to control support of the Chinese.

        Reply
      55. Avatar
        Crystal Thurman on February 27, 2017 1:27 am

        I agree, I don’t think we could have stayed out of WWII

        Reply
      56. Avatar
        Michael Tovissi on April 6, 2017 11:44 pm

        The reason we had an embargo against Japan was because they were invading countries like China and French Indochina. The Japanese were committing horrible crimes in those countries which is why we cut the Japanese off.

        Reply
      57. Avatar
        James Cole on April 7, 2017 3:36 pm

        I find it hard to belie that the US intentionally provoked war with Japan as an excuse for entering WWII on the side of Britain. In my opinion, FDR was one of our greatest presidents. I have a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that Pearl Harbor was a US conspiracy that sacrificed American lives for a political agenda. Something like this would make the US political leaders look heartless that they were willing to sacrifice American troops to further their own political plans for war.

        Reply
      58. Avatar
        Misty Prosser on April 9, 2017 8:30 am

        I do not think it was possible for the United States to stay out of WWII.

        Reply
      59. Avatar
        Angela Kessinger on April 9, 2017 11:23 am

        It is my hope that our President current or past would not intentionally provoke a war. I do not think WWII was provoked nor do I think we could have avoided it.

        Reply
      60. Avatar
        Payton Brown on April 9, 2017 11:19 pm

        I can’t allow myself to believe that a United States president would willingly sacrifice our own troops as a means to get what he wants. That is just not something I want to believe someone could be capable of.

        Reply
      61. Avatar
        Tiffany on April 10, 2017 10:57 pm

        I would hope that one would not sacrifice our own people just to secretly enter a war. I do not put it past him though. It seems, even today, things are done by the government to get points across or use a situation to exploit another.

        Reply
      62. Avatar
        Jaisun on April 11, 2017 10:18 am

        This is one take on WWII that I had not heard before. FDR is revered throughout history for being the one that responded appropriately and effectively after the Pearl Harbor attack. However, it wouldn’t surprise me at all if his motives and pretenses weren’t exactly of pure and he sacrificed the entire U.S. Pacific Fleet because of a political agenda.

        Reply
      63. Avatar
        Patrick Barker on April 11, 2017 1:12 pm

        I have heard these accusations before. I think it makes a lot of sense that FDR’s embargos on oil and other raw materials may be seen as provoking the Empire of Japan. U.S involvement in WWII was inevitable, and FDR would need a reason to join that America could get behind. I think it is a stretch to say that FDR intentionally sacrificed so many United States Navy men. However, Revenge became the name of the game after Pearl Harbor and everyone supported FDR’s decision to attack Japan and enter WWII.

        Reply
      64. Avatar
        Autum Grandstaff on April 11, 2017 9:14 pm

        Unfortunately it seems with politics and historical events, someone is always analyzing and wondering if there is a hidden agenda. I often wonder the same things, as it is easy to fall into believing these theories, or at the very least; question them.

        Reply
      65. Avatar
        Kyle Gelenius on April 15, 2017 2:18 pm

        I can draw a parallel to the claim that FDR intentionally sacrificed the US Pacific Fleet in order to enter WWII to the claim that George W. Bush was behind 9/11 so he could go to war with Iraq. With any significant event in history you will have conspiracy theories. I highly doubt that it was the case in either event, but I will admit it is entirely possible.

        Reply
      66. Avatar
        Ashley Betsa on April 17, 2017 10:45 am

        I agree with Kyle’s statement in drawing a parallel to FRD and Bush regarding desire to go to war. There is a lot in government stances and communications we will never know, thus we will always have conspiracy theories.

        Reply
      67. Avatar
        Jacob DeSmit on April 18, 2017 11:00 pm

        After doing a little digging, I found some perspectives from historians that suggest that FDR was indeed not aware of Japan’s intention to bomb Pearl Harbor, and I am inclined to agree with that view. It makes the most sense that the American government might have only sought to hinder Japan economically through the embargo, which would allow them to “attack” the Axis power without direct war. It is believable that FDR could have foreseen such an actions provoking Japan in some way, but I don’t believe he intended to put his own military on the line.

        The aforementioned source can be found here: http://www.npr.org/2016/12/06/504449867/no-fdr-did-not-know-the-japanese-were-going-to-bomb-pearl-harbor

        Reply
      68. Avatar
        Michelle on April 21, 2017 7:03 pm

        The government has done things before to basically trick the American population into thinking a certain way, I wouldn’t doubt we knew about, possibly even helped construct Pearl Harbor or 911. It sounds terrible, but we have more to gain being at war financially. I suppose we will have to wait until files are leaked or unclassified to find out!

        Reply
      69. Avatar
        Nakia Bridges on April 23, 2017 2:22 am

        I’ve never been one to delve into politics and such, but I am a believer in conspiracy theories. This article made me think….. do we really know the truth about why we go to war or have gone to war?? Are we always told the truth?

        Reply
      70. Avatar
        McKenna Kapper on April 25, 2017 1:50 pm

        This was a very interesting article. I am not sure of FDRs involvement but I do think that we had to step in at some point.

        Reply
      71. Avatar
        Robin Crandel on April 26, 2017 6:35 am

        Eek, such hard questions to answer. The latter of the questions would not be answered on this platform as to the sensitive nature of the question. However, with that being said, we, as the American people, can only hope that our government does not intentionally provoke war.

        Reply
      72. Avatar
        Amanda Miller on April 26, 2017 7:52 pm

        That would be messed up if FDR intentionally had Japan attack us just so we could enter WWII.

        Reply
      73. Avatar
        MIA on April 28, 2017 9:04 am

        I sometimes feel like we don’t actually know the truth about what goes on in this world.. it’s sad to say, but true.

        Reply
      74. Avatar
        Justin Hodson on April 30, 2017 1:54 pm

        There is a history of conspiracy in this country and we never know the whole story of anything. It would not surprise me if this is true about FDR.

        Reply
      75. Avatar
        WenYu Zhang on April 30, 2017 7:30 pm

        i don’t think USA had any plan about FDR. if they have any plans, people would understand it, because every country want to be the king

        Reply
      76. Avatar
        Yang Shao on April 30, 2017 9:56 pm

        Great article by showing Roosevelt was putting US into world war II. People were fighting against their country all over the place.

        Reply
      77. Avatar
        KIMBERLY KESTNER on April 30, 2017 11:23 pm

        Just because he did not have a direct line does not mean there weren’t communications. There is always a way to get what you want when it comes to politics.

        Reply

      Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

      This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

      Follow Us!
      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • YouTube
      • Patreon
      Sign Up For Our Newsletter!
      Most Recent

      This Day in History on December 3rd

      December 3, 2023

      History Short: Disputed Presidential Elections are Nothing New!

      December 3, 2023

      This Day in History on December 2nd

      December 2, 2023

      History Short: What Replaced the Ford Model T?

      December 2, 2023

      This Day in History on December 1st

      December 1, 2023
      This Day in History Video

      Advertisements




      Amazon Affiliate Disclosure Statement

      As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases via links in the “Historical Evidence” sections of articles.

      About HistoryAndHeadlines.com

      Thanks for visiting History and Headlines!  This site exists primarily for educational purposes and is intended as a resource for Dr. Zar’s students.  Articles are mostly written by either Dr. Zar or his dad (Major Dan).  To any guest readers, please keep that in mind when commenting on articles.   Thank you!

      We try to present our students with historical topics that are both diverse and a bit out of the ordinary.  Our motto is “We try until we succeed!”

      Contact us at admin@historyandheadlines.com

      Guidelines and Policies for Images used on This Site, as well as for Guest and Sponsored Articles, and Other Terms of Use

      Privacy Statement

      © 2023 History and Headlines

      All-Time Most Commented

      July 28, 1866: 18 Year Old Girl Wins Commission to Sculpt Statue of Lincoln (A Truly Great American Woman)

      July 28, 2014

      December 24, 1865: Birth of the Ku Klux Klan

      December 24, 2015

      December 25, 1868: President Johnson Pardons all Confederate Veterans

      December 25, 2015

      February 5, 1909: First Plastic Invented was called Bakelite!

      February 5, 2014

      November 23, 1876: “Boss” Tweed Turned Over to Authorities

      November 23, 2013
      Recommended Book
      © 2023 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

      We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

      You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

      History and Headlines
      Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
      Privacy Overview

      This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

      Strictly Necessary Cookies

      Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

      If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.