Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Tuesday, November 28
    Trending
    • This Day in History on November 28th
    • History Short: What is a Pulsar?
    • This Day in History on November 27th
    • History Short: Assassination Meets the Space Age
    • This Day in History on November 26th
    • History Short: Don’t Bogart that Popcorn!
    • This Day in History on November 25th
    • History Short: Unflattering Names of the Old West
    History and Headlines
    • Arts & Entertainment
      • Cinema & TV
      • Games
      • Literature
      • Music
      • Sports
      • Video Games
    • Bizarre Bulletin
      • Misconceptions
      • The Bizarre
      • The Paranormal
      • The Unexplained
    • Lifestyle
      • Animals/Pets
      • Fashion
      • Food
      • Health/Medicine
      • Home Improvement
      • Horoscopes
      • Travel
    • Science & Tech
      • Inventions
      • Nature
      • Vehicles
    • Society
      • Business and Economics
      • Crime
      • Military
      • Politics
      • Religion
      • Society
    • About
      • Welcome to Our Site!
      • This Day in History (articles)
      • This Day in History (categories)
      • Table of Contents: A History of the World
      • Online History Textbooks
      • A Guide to Some of Our Favorite Scholars and Educators
      • Advance Screenings and Movie Reviews Archive
      • Schedule of Video Adaptations of Our Articles
    • Friends
      • Armchair History TV
      • Fact Fiend
      • RealClearHistory
      • Simply Charly
      • TopTenz
      • ​Unique Interpretations
    History and Headlines
    You are at:Home»Arts & Entertainment»Cinema & TV»January 14, 2005: Epic Film Alexander Released in Italy, History or Fiction?
    Cinema & TV

    January 14, 2005: Epic Film Alexander Released in Italy, History or Fiction?

    Major DanBy Major DanJanuary 14, 2016Updated:January 8, 202347 Comments5 Mins Read
    Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Tumblr Twitter VKontakte WhatsApp

    A Brief History

    On January 14, 2005, the big budget Hollywood film, Alexander, starring Colin Farrell in the title role made its debut in Italy, after having opened previously in November of 2004 in the U.S.  A lavish film with a budget of $155 million, the film was successful in that its box office worldwide was over $167 million, but was it real history or just Hollywood?

    Digging Deeper

    Released in the original theatrical form, DVD versions were later released as “Director’s Cut,” “Final Cut,” and “Ultimate Cut” giving movie and history buffs an opportunity to sample different versions of the film.  In fact, Alexander Revisited: The Final Cut released in 2007 sold a whopping 1 million copies while previous DVD versions sold over 3.5 million units.

    Known for taking liberties with actual history in order to condense years of events into a 2 hour film, Hollywood can be forgiven some of its artistic license taken with the subject of Alexander the Great (aka Alexander III of Macedon) as the historical record of this great king and conqueror was written over 200 years after his death in 323 BCE.  Contemporary accounts of Alexander and his reign have been lost, and at least as of now never recovered, leaving one to wonder how much of the “factual” history is indeed true and how much of what we think we know is legend or conjecture.

    Clinging to the legend as much as to fact, critics have taken exception to the film’s adherence to “true” history.  A group of Greek lawyers threatened to sue Warner Brothers and the director, Oliver Stone, over the portrayal of Alexander and his inner circle as indulging in homosexual behavior.  In fact, Stone blamed a weak US box office performance on backlash against the homosexual innuendo by prudish audiences and critics.

    The necessary condensation of time caused chronological inconsistencies with some of Alexander’s famous battles, and historical characters such as Darius III (of the Persians) and Alexander’s general Philotas were portrayed as young men when at the point in history being portrayed in the film they were mature middle aged men.  A famous battle at Hydaspes is shown as being fought on a sunny day in a forest, when the actual battle was fought on a muddy plain at night in the rain.  Alexander is shown suffering an arrow wound in that battle, when historically that wound came month later in a different battle.  The film also merges major battles at Granicus and Issus into the Battle of Gaugamela in an apparent attempt to pay tribute to each of these battles in one cinematic event.  In fact, it took Alexander’s army several hard fought battles over a campaign to defeat the Persians while the film implies one major battle accomplished the feat.     The Persian/Bactrian woman taken by Alexander as a bride, Roxana, is played by an exotic appearing Rosario Dawson, a dark haired, dark skinned actress of Puerto Rican and Cuban descent with African heritage, while the real life Roxana was of fairer complexion and of considerably different appearance.  Modern Iranians were rankled by the portrayal of Persian armies as a mob or rabble, while the Macedonian/Greeks are portrayed as highly disciplined professional soldiers.  In fact, the Persians were clad in uniforms and had similar military professionalism.

    Another historical criticism of the film is the portrayal of Alexander as a blonde haired, blue eyed man, contrary to the modern traits of Greeks and Macedonians being of darker hair and complexion.  In fact, historical records as they are indicate that Alexander was of fair or even ruddy complexion and had either blue eyes or one brown and one blue eye.  His hair may well have been lighter than commonly found in the region today, as in the centuries since Alexander’s life much ethnic mixing of North African and Middle Eastern peoples as well as those from what is modern Afghanistan, Pakistan and India had taken place.

    With an unreliable historical record, it is hard to hold Hollywood to a strict accounting of the life of Alexander the Great.  Unfortunately, that did not stop numerous critics from blasting the alleged “historical” inaccuracies and inconsistencies of the film.  Obviously, such a film cannot be considered a documentary and should not be viewed as a factual record.  After all, every word of the dialogue is made up as no record exists of what was said by whom.  We liked the film as entertainment, and we welcome your opinions about it as well.

    Question for students (and subscribers): Did you find this film useful for understanding the life and character of Alexander the Great?  Please let us know in the comments section below this article.

    If you liked this article and would like to receive notification of new articles, please feel welcome to subscribe to History and Headlines by liking us on Facebook and becoming one of our patrons!

    Your readership is much appreciated!

    Historical Evidence

    For more information, please see…

    Stone, Oliver, dir.  Alexander, Revisited: The Final Cut (Two-Disc Special Edition).  WarnerBrothers, 2008.  DVD.

    Share. Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Twitter Tumblr
    Previous ArticleDeburke321: The Ten Strongest Signs Of Alien Life
    Next Article January 17, 1949: First Television Sitcom, The Goldbergs
    Major Dan
    Major Dan

      Major Dan is a retired veteran of the United States Marine Corps. He served during the Cold War and has traveled to many countries around the world. Prior to his military service, he graduated from Cleveland State University, having majored in sociology. Following his military service, he worked as a police officer eventually earning the rank of captain prior to his retirement.

      Related Posts

      History Short: Don’t Bogart that Popcorn!

      November 26, 2023

      November 20, 2023: Your Chance to Preview Saltburn

      November 16, 2023

      History Short: The First Downtown to Airport Rapid Transit in the Western Hemisphere

      November 15, 2023

      <span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="12724 https://www.historyandheadlines.com/?p=12724">47 Comments

      1. Avatar
        PW on January 28, 2016 7:10 pm

        Most historical movies, “bend the truth.” Most movies wouldn’t be as much of a hit as they are without the producers “bending the truth.” A movie that’s “based off a true story” may only have few actual true references in the movie.

        Reply
      2. Avatar
        MMA on February 10, 2016 1:14 pm

        Although most historical movies are not always the most factual they do bring in a giant amount of viewrs. I do believe that we cannot fault historical movies for not always give all the facts or changing the facts a little for the fact that I am sure the facts that historians have given us have changed over the years and every story is told a different way.

        Reply
      3. Avatar
        Megan Arrendale on February 26, 2016 1:19 pm

        Directors need to bend the truth when making a motion picture based on history to bring in a bigger fan base. It’s all about the money

        Reply
      4. Avatar
        Sarah Shaheen on March 9, 2016 10:48 am

        The thing with historical movies is that they bend the truth just as some of the other have said. We cant tell for sure what had happened because we weren’t there to witness it for ourselves

        Reply
      5. Avatar
        Matthew Barnewall on April 11, 2016 8:55 am

        Sure the movie is not the most accurate depiction of Alexander the Great’s conquests, but it made money and that is what it was intended for. People do not go to the theaters to view documentaries. So if the audience learns something in the process of watching this film, even if the details are a little blurred, that is just an added bonus.

        Reply
      6. Avatar
        JV on April 17, 2016 10:23 pm

        Interesting article. I haven’t seen the movie myself, but i’ve heard on a few occasions that it wasn’t very good.

        Reply
      7. Avatar
        Erin R on April 27, 2016 3:07 pm

        I understand that this movie was made for Hollywood rather than the history buffs that are pointing out its flaws, but some of these mistakes are just unforgivable. For example, changing which battle Alexander received his battle wound is unnecessary and uncalled for. Also, the directors had to have known the type of audience they would draw in and know that and should have made the film as accurate as possible.

        Reply
      8. Avatar
        rpugliese16 on April 28, 2016 10:19 am

        There is nothing wrong with including homosexuality in a movie, but man, there was just way too much in this one. At least for me, it distracted me often from what was going on in the movie because I just kept wondering why it was happening so much. The convoluted timeline was also a huge distraction. The film was extremely hard to follow and way too long.

        Reply
      9. Avatar
        Emily Seiter on April 28, 2016 4:19 pm

        I personally enjoyed this film. It was not meant to be a historical film for the records or documentary, it was meant for entertainment. It did its job it was entertaining. A film like this may peak peoples interest in the subject matter of Alexander and cause them to look further into it and therefor discover the historical inaccuracies. Otherwise audiences should not be using this movie as a reference, just for entertainment. It gives life and an entertaining story to a great historical figure.

        Reply
      10. Avatar
        Clayton Cassidy on April 28, 2016 7:21 pm

        I like this film because it was made to have entertainment value. It was not meant to be totally historically accurate which is ok. The producers obviously had a huge budget as the effects, casting and technology was incredible in this movie. The thing that I did not like as much compared to the 1956 movie was the fact that this movie did not occur in chronological order. Throughout the movie it would constantly jump back and forth in flashbacks and made it confusing at times for the viewer to understand the context.

        Reply
      11. Avatar
        SRP on May 1, 2016 9:50 pm

        Movies bend the truth about many things. They want to entertain people not inform them about every little thing. They want it to be exciting so they don’t always have the most accurate information.

        Reply
      12. Avatar
        Matt M on May 5, 2016 8:50 pm

        I agree that this was a hollywood movie and they exaggerated some of what happened in the film and I thought it was more for entertainment than historically correct

        Reply
      13. Avatar
        Greg B on May 6, 2016 10:23 am

        It was mostly a flashback type of movie which made it confusing for the viewer. Some of the battles were a bit exaggerated and definitely showed more of a mother-son relationship compared to the 1956 film of the father-son relationship.

        Reply
      14. Avatar
        Alexa B on May 6, 2016 1:16 pm

        Hollywood can’t always going along with what happened in history it would not please the viewers if there wasn’t enough action or interesting enough to keep their attention. So when things are based off a true story it does not mean that it is a factual movie.

        Reply
      15. Avatar
        Mariam on May 6, 2016 2:27 pm

        Taking into consideration that this film was only 2 hours, I believe it was made quite nicely. Having to condense such an immense lifetime of someone who was very influential into a 2 hour film is impressive. There is not much Hollywood could have done regarding the factuality because any record of Alexander was written 200 years after his death in 323 BCE.

        Reply
      16. Avatar
        Cori Anter on May 8, 2016 2:09 pm

        I wasn’t the biggest fan of this movie because it jumped from event to event and was very difficult to follow. Although it was intended to be more action driven than some of the actual events of Alexander’s life may have been, I think that they should have made it a bit more historically accurate.

        Reply
      17. Avatar
        APG on May 8, 2016 3:16 pm

        If your’e going to make a movie that is based off of historical events, the least you can do is try to be as historically accurate as possible and not just do whatever you want with smaller details while keeping larger aspects accurate.

        Reply
      18. Avatar
        Andrew Orie on May 8, 2016 4:07 pm

        I feel like the movie struggled in the United States had to do with more than just prude viewers. The movie was very scattered and it was difficult to understand what was going on for much of the film.

        Reply
      19. Avatar
        Tevin Knerr on May 9, 2016 4:47 pm

        You cant believe everything you see in the movie industry, it is made for entertainment, of course much of it is embellished.

        Reply
      20. Avatar
        mmahoney17 on May 9, 2016 4:57 pm

        The homosexual curiosities of Alexander seemed to be emphasized more in this retelling of Alexander’s life than in the original sources. Yes, Hephaestion was important to Alexander, and they were probably lovers. But was Alexander REALLY spending his final hours with an Indian man-servant who he made out with following a “riveting dance?”

        Reply
      21. Avatar
        Zachary Zupancic on May 9, 2016 8:54 pm

        Movies are not meant to be totally accurate all the time. The main goal for these production is to tell a story that is well known in a compelling way that people will want to spend a lot of money on to watch. Many times movies fail to make the money for the studio but they are still able to give their audiences an interesting story.

        Reply
      22. Avatar
        Marlene Villa on May 10, 2016 1:33 am

        I don’t understand why Greek lawyers threaten to sue the movie company for portraying homosexual behavior in the film if that was an actual thing in ancient Greece.

        Reply
      23. Avatar
        David Crowley on May 10, 2016 1:53 pm

        This movie was entertaining at times but sometimes hard to follow. I have no problem with there being debate about the historical accuracies because it is hard to know exactly what happened during this time period. I did have a problem with the flashbacks and then flash forwards. I think it would have been cool if the movie went in chronological order from the beginning.

        Reply
      24. Avatar
        Jonathan Beard on May 11, 2016 4:58 pm

        I felt that this version of the film was confusing by going back and forth in time and added a lot of effects to make it more appealing to the audience. I agree that there are some historical inaccuracies in the movie, but it does give the viewers insight into the lives on Alexander and his army.

        Reply
      25. Avatar
        Kevin Teklinski on May 11, 2016 8:35 pm

        This version of the film was all over the place and left the viewer confused. Movies are meant for entertainment, and being historically accurate may take away from some of that “entertainment”

        Reply
      26. Avatar
        Frankie Alvarez on May 12, 2016 2:18 pm

        I absolutely hated the way this movie jumped around. I can’t imagine being able to actually follow the story if I had no previous knowledge of Alexander’s life. This may not have been as “Hollywood” as 300, but it was definitely “Hollywood”.

        Reply
      27. Avatar
        Joe Kleinmann on May 13, 2016 1:19 am

        This film really does provide quality entertainment, but that is about as far as that goes. I am not locked into this film for historical purposes, just simply to see some good drama and action. In order to truly be invested in it, you would have to be quite attentive to the many directions it took throughout.

        Reply
      28. Avatar
        Mark Smithhisler on May 13, 2016 1:52 am

        I think it is silly to watch these movies expecting to get the “real” or “true” historical recitation. These films are adaptations of adaptations. They are meant to send a specific message about an interpretation of a period in time. The fun is trying to figure out what that message is!

        Reply
      29. Avatar
        Liam Flaherty on May 13, 2016 7:56 am

        I think it is interesting to take into account the possible Western bias being described by modern Iranians. Whereas other historical inaccuracies can be brushed aside as the director taking liberties with the medium of film, Stone’s depiction of the Persian army carries with it an undeniable implicit bias.

        Reply
      30. Avatar
        Ben on May 13, 2016 2:33 pm

        This film was painfully slow. The screenwriting was weak. The acting was not believable. Plus they tried to be cute by presenting events out of order, but that didn’t contribute to making the movie any better (or less worse). I would sooner watch the 1956 Alexander the Great film twice than watch this one again.

        Reply
      31. Avatar
        Matthew Goss on November 25, 2016 6:55 pm

        Hollywood for sure beefed up the content of this film. However, as I have not seen it, I do not know the degree. All accounts of Alexander have some sort of storytelling element to it, and this movie is no exception.

        Reply
      32. Avatar
        Shane Skuhrovec on November 28, 2016 5:35 pm

        As always when it comes to movies, Hollywood tries to make the most money by adding in content and stories in order to make the story seem better. I have not seen this version so I do not know how much Hollywood decided to add in to it, but most movies about historic figures are somewhat fabricated to make money at the box offices.

        Reply
      33. Avatar
        KR on December 11, 2016 11:59 pm

        It is important to remember the distinction between film as entertainment and film as educational material. Not all film is trying to be 100% accurate, and in the case of any film about Alexander the Great, it is almost impossible due to lack of primary source information.

        Reply
      34. Avatar
        Matthew Olen on December 13, 2016 11:17 pm

        Having seen this film you can really tell some of the details are added strictly for entertainment, which can be expected especially as they get more modern. However, it was a very good movie.

        Reply
      35. Avatar
        Bryan Mersol on December 15, 2016 5:57 pm

        It is interesting to see the different depictions of Alexander

        Reply
      36. Avatar
        Tom Kubrak on December 16, 2016 10:55 am

        I find that the older version of the movie was better. Even though I never really watched this one, I just know that many actors and actresses got worst actor/actress of the year award due to this movie. This makes me unmotivated to see this version.

        Reply
      37. Avatar
        Trever Himes on February 15, 2017 1:21 pm

        I have viewed, and very much enjoyed this movie. I think if you take it for what it is, a Hollywood film, and not expect a historical documentary, you’d be much more please with the film. It is entertainment and ere for needs to be entertaining. Nobody wants to watch and army take month to march acrossed Persia.

        Reply
      38. Avatar
        shane myers on February 25, 2017 2:15 pm

        the movies still has to make money so changing history is something they have to do

        Reply
      39. Avatar
        Layne W on March 7, 2017 11:34 am

        Homosexuality was not viewed the same as it is today in Ancient Greece and Rome. I’m not saying that it is true or not that Alexander had relations with men, but back then it was not shameful to have sex with another man. The stigma was actually against being in the submissive sex position. I think that it was an interesting bit of creative license Hollywood took, including intimate scenes between Alexander and other men.

        Reply
      40. Avatar
        Mason Nist on March 14, 2017 8:01 am

        I find it humorous that these movie critics took so much offense to the “inaccuracy” of an action film. Not a documentary film. If they want to make a fuss about inaccuracies, why don’t they just read the news.

        Reply
      41. Avatar
        Robert Miller on March 15, 2017 9:31 am

        Have to take a grain of salt with anything that comes out of Hollywood.

        Reply
      42. Avatar
        Aurora Umberger on March 18, 2017 2:14 pm

        I think a lot of people take film to always be truth and 100% accurate; people should really understand that everything in film is not 100% accurate or even real.

        Reply
      43. Avatar
        kayla connelly on March 20, 2017 10:25 pm

        people twist the plot and the details of the actual event to make it more interesting

        Reply
      44. Avatar
        Sydney P. on March 28, 2017 7:58 pm

        If time was the issue and is what caused the inaccuracies then why didn’t they make it a two part film? or a series even? That was at least it could be credible and more detailed.

        Reply
      45. Avatar
        Heather Layton on May 2, 2017 7:03 pm

        It’s funny that some of the movie critics were upset that the movie wasn’t completely accurate. It was an action movie, not a documentary.

        Reply
      46. Avatar
        Marynette Holmes on May 9, 2017 8:46 pm

        This was one of my favorite movies! reading all of the things that they changed though upsets me. Yes movies are never true to the real story but they could’ve tried to stick as close to it! i never knew this stuff when i watched the movie the first few times 🙁

        Reply
      47. Avatar
        Casey Jones on May 10, 2017 12:49 am

        Movies now-a-days aren’t meant to be dead on accurate. They try to impress a target audience, which typically involves a lot of action and altering of facts to make it more interesting.

        Reply

      Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

      This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

      Follow Us!
      • Facebook
      • Twitter
      • YouTube
      • Patreon
      Sign Up For Our Newsletter!
      Most Recent

      This Day in History on November 28th

      November 28, 2023

      History Short: What is a Pulsar?

      November 28, 2023

      This Day in History on November 27th

      November 27, 2023

      History Short: Assassination Meets the Space Age

      November 27, 2023

      This Day in History on November 26th

      November 26, 2023
      This Day in History Video

      Advertisements




      Amazon Affiliate Disclosure Statement

      As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases via links in the “Historical Evidence” sections of articles.

      About HistoryAndHeadlines.com

      Thanks for visiting History and Headlines!  This site exists primarily for educational purposes and is intended as a resource for Dr. Zar’s students.  Articles are mostly written by either Dr. Zar or his dad (Major Dan).  To any guest readers, please keep that in mind when commenting on articles.   Thank you!

      We try to present our students with historical topics that are both diverse and a bit out of the ordinary.  Our motto is “We try until we succeed!”

      Contact us at admin@historyandheadlines.com

      Guidelines and Policies for Images used on This Site, as well as for Guest and Sponsored Articles, and Other Terms of Use

      Privacy Statement

      © 2023 History and Headlines

      All-Time Most Commented

      July 28, 1866: 18 Year Old Girl Wins Commission to Sculpt Statue of Lincoln (A Truly Great American Woman)

      July 28, 2014

      December 24, 1865: Birth of the Ku Klux Klan

      December 24, 2015

      December 25, 1868: President Johnson Pardons all Confederate Veterans

      December 25, 2015

      February 5, 1909: First Plastic Invented was called Bakelite!

      February 5, 2014

      November 23, 1876: “Boss” Tweed Turned Over to Authorities

      November 23, 2013
      Recommended Book
      © 2023 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

      We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

      You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

      History and Headlines
      Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
      Privacy Overview

      This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

      Strictly Necessary Cookies

      Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

      If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.