Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Thursday, March 23
    Trending
    • This Day in History on March 23rd
    • R.I.P. Lance Reddick (1962-2023)
    • This Day in History on March 22nd
    • This Day in History on March 21st
    • Animated Map of the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine (through March 20th, 2023)
    • This Day in History on March 20th
    • April 4, 2023: Your Chance to Preview Air
    • This Day in History on March 19th
    History and Headlines
    • Arts & Entertainment
      • Cinema & TV
      • Games
      • Literature
      • Music
      • Sports
      • Video Games
    • Bizarre Bulletin
      • Misconceptions
      • The Bizarre
      • The Paranormal
      • The Unexplained
    • Lifestyle
      • Animals/Pets
      • Fashion
      • Food
      • Health/Medicine
      • Home Improvement
      • Horoscopes
      • Travel
    • Science & Tech
      • Inventions
      • Nature
      • Vehicles
    • Society
      • Business and Economics
      • Crime
      • Military
      • Politics
      • Religion
      • Society
    • About
      • Welcome to Our Site!
      • This Day in History
      • Table of Contents: A History of the World
      • Online History Textbooks
      • A Guide to Some of Our Favorite Scholars and Educators
      • Advance Screenings and Movie Reviews Archive
      • Schedule of Video Adaptations of Our Articles
    • Friends
      • Armchair History TV
      • Fact Fiend
      • RealClearHistory
      • Simply Charly
      • TopTenz
      • ​Unique Interpretations
    History and Headlines
    You are at:Home»Science & Technology»Nature»October 27, 1553: Is Religion the Enemy of Science?
    Nature

    October 27, 1553: Is Religion the Enemy of Science?

    Major DanBy Major DanOctober 27, 2018Updated:June 4, 2020No Comments9 Mins Read
    Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Tumblr Twitter VKontakte WhatsApp
    Michael Servetus

    A Brief History

    On October 27, 1553, a Spanish scientist versed in many disciplines, Michael Servetus, was burned at the stake for heresy.  The first researcher to correctly identify pulmonary circulation as the aeration of the blood through the lungs, his mind was a valuable tool for the Renaissance world that was snuffed out because of religious bigotry, a problem history has seen again and again over the years.  Does religion continue to suppress the advance of science?  Are religion and science incompatible?  Today we look at some of the ways religion and science have crossed swords over the years, including some of controversies that remain today between people of science and people of faith.

    Digging Deeper

    Michael Servetus, born in The Kingdom of Aragon (modern Spain) around 1511, was an educated man capable of reading Greek and Latin and was an academic of note, studying an incredible array of subjects, including theology and the Bible, mathematics, astronomy, meteorology, medicine and anatomy, pharmacology, cartography and even poetry.  His greatest expertise lay in the field of medicine and anatomy.  Servetus ran afoul of the Catholic Church with his writings denouncing the idea of the Holy Trinity.  On the other hand, the Catholic Church ran afoul of Servetus by layering luxury and riches on the Pope and his Cardinals, something Servetus found distasteful.  Servetus became enamored of the Protestant Reformation, with Calvinism in particular, and had to flee from France, where he was working as a physician, to Geneva on his way to Italy where he thought he could find refuge.  Meanwhile, the deep thinkers in France burned books written by Servetus, as book burning is a hallmark of idiots that try to suppress the human advance of knowledge and thoughts.  Part of the ideas that Servetus espoused that got him into trouble with the Catholic Church was his questioning of pre-destination.  Servetus thought the idea that some great master plan of God’s pre-ordained whether or not a person’s soul was fated to either Heaven or Hell was in conflict with what Servetus thought of as free will.  (The incompatibility of free will vs. God’s Plan continues to result in fierce religious debate today.)  Servetus made the blunder of attending a service by Calvin himself in Geneva and was arrested after the service.  With French Inquisitors demanding extradition, Calvin was under pressure to defend his own Christian orthodoxy, and Calvin in turn denounced Servetus who was convicted of Nontrinitarianism (including being against the baptism of infants) and some sort of accusation about being a homosexual.  Servetus defended himself against the sexual charge by pointing out that he suffered from a serious inguinal hernia that precluded him from having sex.  Servetus was of course convicted and the murderous mob involved had a problem.  In Geneva the penalty for a foreigner being convicted of blasphemy or heresy was banishment.  Numerous religious figures were consulted, even Martin Luther himself, and it was decided to have Michael Servetus burned anyway, and atop a pyre of his own books for good measure.  Thus, at the age of 42 (about), the life of one of the great minds of the 16th Century was lost because of religious persecution.

    Miguel Servet, Miguel de Villanueva (1511 – 1553) engraving

    Religion has also impeded the advance of medicine and the study of anatomy by making the study of cadavers taboo.  Medical researchers routinely had to rely on stolen corpses to conduct detailed dissections to study human anatomy.  One can only speculate about the delay caused by religion in learning about human anatomy and functions.  Early healers were often accused as witches and were persecuted, even killed, delaying the exploitation of their findings and expansion on their knowledge.  Even today, the debate about stem cell research is largely a religious argument against harvesting stem cells for the research.  While adult stem cells are freely used for research and treatment, it is the embryonic stem cells that generate religious opposition.  At stake is the possibility of using embryonic stem cell treatment to cure paralysis, blindness, and other currently incurable medical situations.

    A much discussed area of science that was stifled by religion for many years was the understanding of the Earth’s place in the cosmos.  First Copernicus (Nikolai Kopernik) and then Galileo had to hide their true findings and beliefs about the solar system being Heliocentric (the planets revolve around the sun) instead of Geocentric (the sun and other planets revolve around the Earth), Copernicus remained quiet until he was already dead and Galileo was forced to recant and live in isolation for his heresy.  The Catholic Church did not allow the distribution and reading of scientific heliocentric texts until 1822, 2 centuries after Copernicus proved the model of the solar system and Galileo spread the word.

    A hypothetical geocentric model of the solar system (upper panel) in comparison to the heliocentric model (lower panel).

    Blaming God for various events also stifles scientific examination of the causes and effects of human and natural actions.  Pat Robertson, a television preacher of some note, famously claimed the earthquake in Haiti (2010, 160,000 to 316,000 killed) was retribution from God for the Haitians getting their independence from France (1791) through a deal with the Devil.  This sort of buffoonery is akin to blaming Hurricane Katrina on the lifestyle of the people of New Orleans, which is supposedly un-Godlike somehow.  It took real science to figure out that putting lightning rods on buildings prevented the destruction of the buildings during thunderstorms, not merely accepting that Zeus was throwing lightning bolts to punish people.

    A major controversy that continues today between religion and science is faith healing and the belief that using modern medicine is somehow cheating God out of the opportunity to decide if someone lives or dies.  All sorts of lawsuits and criminal cases have been filed in the United States, where people expect their right to religious freedom to be unfettered by other people’s beliefs and judgments.  Many a snake handler has died after being bitten by a venomous snake and refusing medical care, and the subject of minor children that have their parents decide to avoid modern treatment for completely treatable conditions resulting in the death of the child is sure to raise a heated argument.

    Snake handling at the Church of God with Signs Following at Lejunior in Harlan County, Kentucky 15 September 1946 (NARA). Photo by Russell Lee.

    The creationist side of how the Earth and human beings came about has stifled scientific inquiry into those subjects, stifled by those that insist the Earth is only a few thousand years old and that people co-existed with dinosaurs.  The science of evolution is often a main target of creationists that would prevent the teaching of evolution in our schools if they could.  Climate change and other environmental factors also come into play when the science is limited by rigid creationism.

    Another ridiculous limiting factor on science courtesy of religion is the condemnation of science developed by a scientist from a faith other people do not believe in.  Albert Einstein, possibly the smartest man in the world at the time, had to flee Europe to avoid persecution for being Jewish.  Almost as bad as if the anti-Semites had known he was really an atheist!  (Speaking of which, the late Stephen Hawking revealed in writings after his death that he too was an atheist, as are a great many of today’s and yesterday’s scientists such as Richard Dawkins, Neil deGrasse Tyson, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Bill Nye the Science Guy, George Crile, Edmund Halley, Alfred Nobel, Carl Sagan, Richard Leakey, Erns Mach, Linus Pauling, Ivan Pavlov, Niels Bohr, Pierre and Marie Curie and many, many others.  Would we refuse the discoveries of these scientists or their teachings because of religion?  Some people would!  The work of Sigmund Freud was largely condemned by anti-Semites because of Freud’s Jewishness (probably atheism), and yet Freud is the Father of Psychoanalysis.  His books were burned in 1930’s Germany along with those of other Jewish scientists and thinkers.  Scientists of the atheistic point of view often condemn religion for causing people to take at face value mythical explanations for natural occurrences and phenomena instead of piquing the imagination of smart people to investigate and figure things out.  These atheists bluntly accuse religion of keeping people stupid but happy at the expense of expanding the volume of human knowledge.

    Book burning in Berlin, May 1933

    Obviously, we believe that religion is at least sometimes an impediment to scientific learning and research.  Just how bad the problem is escapes us, so perhaps our readers can help shed some light on the depth or non-depth as it may be of the “problem.”  Please share instances you believe religion has stifles science, or if you are of the opinion that religion in no way is a limiting factor on science, please explain to the rest of our readers why it is not.

    Question for students (and subscribers): Should creationism be taught in public schools alongside or instead of evolution?  Carl Sagan once said there are at least 100 billion galaxies of 100 billion stars each (based on observations from Earth).  Do you believe him?  (A 2010 study estimated a minimum of 300 sextillion stars in the known Universe!)  Does science undermine religion?  Does religion undermine science?  Are the 2 compatible?  Please let us know in the comments section below this article.

    Sagan in 1980

    If you liked this article and would like to receive notification of new articles, please feel welcome to subscribe to History and Headlines by liking us on Facebook and becoming one of our patrons!

    Your readership is much appreciated!

    Historical Evidence

    For more information, please see…

    Ecklund, Elaine Howard. Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think. Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Ecklund, Elaine Howard and Chrisopher Scheitle. Religion vs. Science: What Religious People Really Think. Oxford University Press, 2017.

    Fuller, Steve. Science vs. Religion: Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution. Polity, 2013.

    The featured image in this article, an engraving by Christian Fritzsch (1695–1769) of Miguel Servet, Miguel de Villanueva (1511 – 1553) from circa 1740, is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author’s life plus 70 years or less.

    Share. Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Twitter Tumblr
    Previous ArticleOctober 26, 2001: What is the USA Patriot Act?
    Next Article Jerks of the Month, October 2018
    Major Dan

    Major Dan is a retired veteran of the United States Marine Corps. He served during the Cold War and has traveled to many countries around the world. Prior to his military service, he graduated from Cleveland State University, having majored in sociology. Following his military service, he worked as a police officer eventually earning the rank of captain prior to his retirement.

    Related Posts

    Happy Saint Patrick’s Day and Women’s History Month 2023!

    March 17, 2023

    History Short: Is Nuclear Power Safe?

    March 12, 2023

    History Short: Popes Pick some Odd Names!

    March 10, 2023
    Follow Us!
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Patreon
    Sign Up For Our Newsletter!
    Most Recent

    This Day in History on March 23rd

    March 23, 2023

    R.I.P. Lance Reddick (1962-2023)

    March 23, 2023

    This Day in History on March 22nd

    March 22, 2023

    This Day in History on March 21st

    March 21, 2023

    Animated Map of the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine (through March 20th, 2023)

    March 20, 2023
    This Day in History Video

    Advertisements




    Amazon Affiliate Disclosure Statement

    As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases via links in the “Historical Evidence” sections of articles.

    About HistoryAndHeadlines.com

    Thanks for visiting History and Headlines!  This site exists primarily for educational purposes and is intended as a resource for Dr. Zar’s students.  Articles are mostly written by either Dr. Zar or his dad (Major Dan).  To any guest readers, please keep that in mind when commenting on articles.   Thank you!

    We try to present our students with historical topics that are both diverse and a bit out of the ordinary.  Our motto is “We try until we succeed!”

    Contact us at admin@historyandheadlines.com

    Guidelines and Policies for Images used on This Site, as well as for Guest and Sponsored Articles, and Other Terms of Use

    Privacy Statement

    © 2023 History and Headlines

    All-Time Most Commented

    July 28, 1866: 18 Year Old Girl Wins Commission to Sculpt Statue of Lincoln (A Truly Great American Woman)

    July 28, 2014

    December 24, 1865: Birth of the Ku Klux Klan

    December 24, 2015

    December 25, 1868: President Johnson Pardons all Confederate Veterans

    December 25, 2015

    February 5, 1909: First Plastic Invented was called Bakelite!

    February 5, 2014

    November 23, 1876: “Boss” Tweed Turned Over to Authorities

    November 23, 2013
    Recommended Book
    © 2023 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

    You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

    History and Headlines
    Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

    Strictly Necessary Cookies

    Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

    If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.