Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Saturday, February 4
    Trending
    • This Day in History on February 4th
    • History Short: Why Did They Call Her “Bloody Mary?”
    • February 3, 2023: Some Questions on this Week’s News
    • This Day in History on February 3rd
    • History Short: The Most Important Naval Battle You Never Heard Of
    • Animated Map of the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine (through February 2nd, 2023)
    • This Day in History on February 2nd
    • History Short: What Else is February 2nd Known For?
    History and Headlines
    • Arts & Entertainment
      • Cinema & TV
      • Games
      • Literature
      • Music
      • Sports
      • Video Games
    • Bizarre Bulletin
      • Misconceptions
      • The Bizarre
      • The Paranormal
      • The Unexplained
    • Lifestyle
      • Animals/Pets
      • Fashion
      • Food
      • Health/Medicine
      • Home Improvement
      • Horoscopes
      • Travel
    • Science & Tech
      • Inventions
      • Nature
      • Vehicles
    • Society
      • Business and Economics
      • Crime
      • Military
      • Politics
      • Religion
      • Society
    • About
      • Welcome to Our Site!
      • This Day in History
      • Table of Contents: A History of the World
      • Online History Textbooks
      • A Guide to Some of Our Favorite Scholars and Educators
      • Advance Screenings and Movie Reviews Archive
      • Schedule of Video Adaptations of Our Articles
    • Friends
      • Armchair History TV
      • Fact Fiend
      • RealClearHistory
      • Simply Charly
      • TopTenz
      • ​Unique Interpretations
    History and Headlines
    You are at:Home»Society»Business and Economics»Were the Nazis Actually Socialists?
    Business and Economics

    Were the Nazis Actually Socialists?

    Major DanBy Major DanApril 3, 2021Updated:May 2, 2021No Comments8 Mins Read
    Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Tumblr Twitter VKontakte WhatsApp
    National Socialist German Workers' Party

    A Brief History

    On February 24, 1920, the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (“German Workers’ Party,” or DAP) changed its name to the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (“National Socialist German Workers’ Party”, or Nazi Party), with the word “Socialist” being added by the party’s executive committee, over Adolf Hitler’s objections, in order to help appeal to left-wing workers.  Today, History and Headlines takes a look at a frequently asked question, “Were the Nazis actually socialists?”  Does their very name mean anything? With their official party’s name being National Socialist German Workers’ Party, in English, or more precisely Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei in the original German, one could easily infer that as the name implies, the Nazi party espouses a “socialist” platform and philosophy.  But is this designation indeed the case?

    Digging Deeper

    Before we can answer the question, we have to agree upon a definition of what socialism is and who socialists are.  Today we hear the word socialist thrown around as an accusation in American politics with varying degrees of accuracy and inaccuracy, so it is best to understand what that particular form of governance really is.  We find the Merriam-Webster Dictionary definition to be as follows:

    Definition of socialism

    1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

    2a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property

    b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

    3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

    Reading this dictionary definition, we can quickly ascertain that a critical element in the definition of socialism is that private property and private commercial industry is non-existent, that all property is of the collective of the people and all industry is owned by the state, or in effect by the population at large instead of private shareholders or owners.  The writings of Karl Marx are the foundation for what the academic understanding of socialism is, and those writings can easily be consulted in order to clear up any misunderstandings of the definition and description of a socialist state.

    Another way of looking at the definition and common understanding of what socialism is can be derived by examining how people today understand the concept in a colloquial way.  In this manner, we have a more liberal definition of socialism, or at least in socialist tendencies, based on not the ironbound rigid prohibition against private property, but a more composite society where both private property and capitalism exists in a framework also characterized by massive government programs that take the traditional role formerly filled by private enterprise.  Such endeavors would include “socialized” medicine, where all the citizens of a country or other political division would have government provided health care and or insurance, and government monopolies on vital services such as utilities.  The greater extent of government ownership of production of energy, natural resources, hard goods, and services, as well as government being intricately involved in rules and regulations governing other aspects of daily life are an indication of the level of “socialism” present in the system being examined.

    We hear references to Scandinavian countries as being allegedly “socialist” because of their high levels of government provided services and constraints on their people, including education, health care, work rules, retirement/pensions and heavy taxation to pay for all this government provided largesse.  Yet these countries, as most other industrialized nations, also have a thriving private industry base.  Other countries, now numbering in the extreme few, cling to communist ideals of socialism, including China, Vietnam, and Cuba, although China especially has demonstrated a serious breach of communist doctrine by opening up a certain level of capitalist activity.  Few if any countries today can measure up to the strict dictionary definition of socialism, though we seem happy enough to refer to many European model nations as “socialist” and of course label the few remaining communist nations as socialists.

    By our colloquial definition, the United States is called by some observers to be a “socialist” country, while in fact we retain a vast array of private property ownership and privately owned businesses, with no national universal health care or retirement system.  Oh wait!  We do have Social Security, a partial retirement fund, and Medicare/Medicaid, a program of health insurance coverage for elderly and poor people.  Yet we also have no national government owned electric company or government monopoly on natural resources.  (You may note that many countries have “nationalized” their oil and other natural resources, taking those resources out of the hands of private enterprise.)  Although many other government programs, such as work regulations, Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, the Environmental Protection Agency, and even seemingly “normal” services such as police and fire protection, maintenance of streets and highways, and many other aspects of daily life can all be and ARE often described as “socialist” programs, we do not generally consider the United States to be a “socialist” country, at least not yet!

    So where in this continuum of capitalism/free rein vs. socialism does the Third Reich land?  Certainly under the Nazi rule (from 1933 to 1945) the German government became intrusive into the lives of their population in a major way.  Trade unions, a bastion of freedom for the working class, were banned in Nazi Germany, with the state taking over the role of “looking out for the welfare of the workers.”  Of course, this premise was a sham, with the government using working people as if they were serfs from an earlier day, slave labor forced to work for substandard wages on government projects. This sort of nationalism of the workers can be construed to be a hallmark of socialism.  Much has been made politically over the fact that the Germans were the ones who first instituted a form of Social Security, supposedly a model followed by the United States. Government projects, construction, industrial and social, became a large part of everyday life for the German population, and democracy became a casualty to National Socialism, as the Nazis often called their system.

    One could easily ask, “How can the people truly own their own government in the absence of real democracy?”  We believe this question is indeed legitimate.  Furthermore, German industrial concerns in private ownership remained throughout the Nazi period, even in the darkest days of World War II as the country was collapsing.  Profits making certain capitalist rich and richer never went out of style in Nazi Germany!  Enormous capitalist firms such as Daimler-Benz, Porsche, Krupp (defunct as of 1999), Henschel (which became wholly consumed by Mercedes-Benz in the 1990’s), Hugo Boss, Messerschmitt (absorbed in corporate mergers in 1989), Focke-Wulf  (absorbed in mergers in 1954), Volkswagen (which now owns at least 8 car manufacturing companies including German and foreign companies, as well as motorcycle and heavy vehicle manufacturers), Bayer and IG Farben (officially liquidated in 2012, though some of its subsidiaries such as Bayer remain in business) among others survived the war to continue as industrial powerhouses after Second World War and the Nazi era had ended.

    In fact, one of the criticisms of the German war effort during World War II was that the national government did not nationalize all industry and take production out of private hands.  The Germans and their “National Socialist” government failed to go the extra mile to truly socialize the war production effort, while private investors and entrepreneurs continued to reap great wealth.  While the post-war banking industry was largely controlled by the central government bank, initially the Bank deutscher Länder (BdL) and later the Bündesbank, the Nazi era bankers were to a great extend intimately involved in the operations of the new national banking system.

    Thus, we can safely answer our topic question, “Were the Nazis actually Socialists?” in the negative.  No, they were not socialists, although the Nazi government of Germany certainly did take greater than previous control of many aspects of everyday life for the German people, the wide-ranging continuation of capitalist investment, contracts, production and trade are antithetical to what we would consider “socialism.”  Like many countries today, Nazi Germany was really more of a composite society with aspects of capitalism and private ownership and intrusive government involvement in the workings of society, though we would hesitate to compare the Third Reich to the modern United States or countries of the European Union!

    Question for students (and subscribers): Was the Third Reich actually a socialist society? Please let us know in the comments section below this article.

    If you liked this article and would like to receive notification of new articles, please feel welcome to subscribe to History and Headlines by liking us on Facebook and becoming one of our patrons!

    Your readership is much appreciated!

    Historical Evidence

    For more information, please see…

    Fritzsche, Peter. Hitler’s First Hundred Days: When Germans Embraced the Third Reich.  Basic Books, 2020

    Shirer, William. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. RosettaBooks, 2011.

    The featured image in this article, photographs by Berlin-George of a German NSDAP Donation Token from 1932’s Free State of Prussia elections, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

    You can also watch a video version of this article on YouTube.

    Share. Email Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Telegram Twitter Tumblr
    Previous ArticleDid the Axis Powers Want to Conquer Latin America during World War II?
    Next Article Mine Disaster Gets Mining Company 369 Citations!
    Major Dan

    Major Dan is a retired veteran of the United States Marine Corps. He served during the Cold War and has traveled to many countries around the world. Prior to his military service, he graduated from Cleveland State University, having majored in sociology. Following his military service, he worked as a police officer eventually earning the rank of captain prior to his retirement.

    Related Posts

    History Short: Why Did They Call Her “Bloody Mary?”

    February 4, 2023

    History Short: The Most Important Naval Battle You Never Heard Of

    February 3, 2023

    Animated Map of the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine (through February 2nd, 2023)

    February 2, 2023
    Follow Us!
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Patreon
    Sign Up For Our Newsletter!
    Most Recent

    This Day in History on February 4th

    February 4, 2023

    History Short: Why Did They Call Her “Bloody Mary?”

    February 4, 2023

    February 3, 2023: Some Questions on this Week’s News

    February 3, 2023

    This Day in History on February 3rd

    February 3, 2023

    History Short: The Most Important Naval Battle You Never Heard Of

    February 3, 2023
    This Day in History Video

    Advertisements




    Amazon Affiliate Disclosure Statement

    As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases via links in the “Historical Evidence” sections of articles.

    About HistoryAndHeadlines.com

    Thanks for visiting History and Headlines!  This site exists primarily for educational purposes and is intended as a resource for Dr. Zar’s students.  Articles are mostly written by either Dr. Zar or his dad (Major Dan).  To any guest readers, please keep that in mind when commenting on articles.   Thank you!

    We try to present our students with historical topics that are both diverse and a bit out of the ordinary.  Our motto is “We try until we succeed!”

    Contact us at admin@historyandheadlines.com

    Guidelines and Policies for Images used on This Site, as well as for Guest and Sponsored Articles, and Other Terms of Use

    Privacy Statement

    © 2022 History and Headlines

    All-Time Most Commented

    July 28, 1866: 18 Year Old Girl Wins Commission to Sculpt Statue of Lincoln (A Truly Great American Woman)

    July 28, 2014

    December 24, 1865: Birth of the Ku Klux Klan

    December 24, 2015

    December 25, 1868: President Johnson Pardons all Confederate Veterans

    December 25, 2015

    February 5, 1909: First Plastic Invented was called Bakelite!

    February 5, 2014

    November 23, 1876: “Boss” Tweed Turned Over to Authorities

    November 23, 2013
    Recommended Book
    © 2023 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

    You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

    History and Headlines
    Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

    Strictly Necessary Cookies

    Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

    If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.