A Brief History
On April 21, 1934, one of the most famous photographs in history was alleged to have been taken by a London gynecologist!
Digging Deeeper
Loch Ness, one of a number of lakes in the Scottish Highlands, is said to be inhabited by a monster(s).
The earliest reference to such a creature in Loch Ness goes back to 6th century, when a man was allegedly attacked by an unknown beast. The modern history begins in 1933 when the term “Loch Ness Monster” was first used in a newspaper article which was followed by numerous “sightings” and the first report of the monster on land by a Mr. Spicer and his wife.
Although not the first photograph of “Nessie” as the monster is affectionately called, the “Surgeon’s Photograph” is relatively clear compared to the first photo taken by Hugh Gray. The photo appears to show the long neck and small head of a creature swimming along with its body hidden just under the water. Critics have said the photo is of an elephant moving under water with its trunk extended out of the water. Other opined that the photo was of a waterbird such as a goose or loon.
In 1975, the actual photographer, Christian Spurling, revealed that his photo was a hoax, and later described the entire process in book, Nessie- The Surgeon’s Photograph Exposed (1999). Spurling admitted that the hoax photograph was of a small submarine (bought at Woolworth’s) with the head and neck constructed of plastic wood.
Of course, other researchers and documentary makers have a vested interest in the continued belief in Nessie and dispute Spurling’s confession. So much “research” has been done by investigators keeping the Loch under 24 hour camera surveillance, extensive sonar mapping of the depths and attempts at underwater photography, not to mention the tourist dollars that having the public convinced the whole thing is a hoax would cost these people plenty of money.
Interest in the Loch Ness Monster seems not to have been diminished by Spurling’s assertion that his photo was a hoax. An incredible variety of research has continued through the 2000’s up to this day. An enormous array of books, movies, television programs, comic books and cartoons, amusement park rides, video games, and even rock and roll songs and videos have starred or featured Nessie! (A list of all the cultural references would be longer than this article.)
Question for students (and subscribers): Is Nessie real? Is she a prehistoric dinosaur relative, perhaps a plesiosaur? Is she really a giant eel, one or more seals, an unknown aquatic mammal, a diving bird, or what? Tell us what you think, hoax or real, and if real, then what? Please let us know in the comments section below this article.
If you liked this article and would like to receive notification of new articles, please feel welcome to subscribe to History and Headlines by liking us on Facebook and becoming one of our patrons!
Your readership is much appreciated!
Historical Evidence
For more information, please see…
Campbell, Steuart. The Loch Ness Monster: The Evidence. Prometheus Books, 1997.
Schach, David. The Loch Ness Monster (Torque Books: The Unexplained) (Torque: The Unexplained). Bellwether Media, 2010.
<span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="1836 http://www.crackedhistory.com/?p=1836">18 Comments
I think Nessie is a Hoax.
I think Nessie is real and is shown in the photograph after reading this article.
I think Nessie is a complete hoax.
I think she could be real! I don’t know much about it though.
Loch Ness monster is probably a hoax.
I don’t think she is real, but I do think it is possible for things to be in the deep ocean where we have not explored as much.
I don’t think Nessie is real.
I don’t think it is real but of course is good for the community probably bringing in many of interested tourists.
I believe there is a lot that still needs to be discovered; including many animals.
There are many animals in the ocean that we haven’t discovered yet. Who’s to say one isn’t Nessie?
I do think Nessie is real. She is probably related to some prehistoric dinosaur! like other people mentioned in the comments, I’m sure that there are a lot of creatures that haven’t been discovered yet.
Without hard proof, these photos serve as nothing more than fuel for the skeptical fire.
I wonder how long it took to build a Loch Ness monster submarine and snap a decent picture.
Certainly very upset this picture was a hoax but this does inspire the imagination of my young children like me in my childhood. I still hope the finding this picture was a hoax is actually a hoax and Nessie is real!
I feel like if Nessie was really real, it would show up a whole lot more.
Again, I really don’t think that these photos can prove anything other than the fact that there might be an extremely large fish living there.
Nessie has lived on because of its legend. I don’t believe it ever existed.
Obviously this photo is a farce, but I do believe in some legitimacy behind the Nessie story. I do not think it is some crazy, never-before-seen creature of the deep, but I think it is some enlarged fish or amphibian that has developed this massive following and dramatic story.